Skip to main

The Art of Managing Up | Next Level Careers

August 27, 2026

two people talking

The Art of Managing Up

Your relationship with your manager shapes more of your workday than almost anything else on the org chart. It affects which projects land on your desk, how your work gets described in rooms you are not in, and whether Monday morning feels like momentum or something to brace for.

Most people never think to work on that relationship the way they would work on a skill. They just hope it goes well.

That is where managing up comes in. It is a real, learnable professional skill, and it's one you can build on. This guide covers what managing up means in practice, seven habits that make it work, and how to adapt when your working style and your manager's do not naturally line up.

What Does It Mean to Manage Up?

At its core, managing up means building a strong, productive working relationship with your manager. That means understanding their goals, their communication style, and what is on their priority list, then adapting how you work so both of you get better outcomes.

It is easy to hear "managing up" and picture something a little calculated, like you are playing an angle or working your manager for a promotion. But managing up is about being more intentional in a professional relationship you already have, and using it to produce better work and a better working environment.

It is also not something only meant for junior employees. From directors managing up to VPs, VPs managing up to executives, and executives managing up to boards and owners. If you have been treating this as a skill you need until you have enough seniority to stop needing it, that is worth reconsidering because the people who are best at it are usually the ones furthest along, because they never stopped practicing.

What Managing Up Is Not

Before going further, it helps to be clear about what managing up is not.

  • Supervising or controlling your manager
  • Going around your manager to get what you want
  • Flattery, or trying to impress your way into someone's good graces
  • Quietly absorbing work that belongs to your manager
  • Taking responsibility for changing how someone leads
  • Pretending problems do not exist to keep the peace

Filling every gap you notice feels like initiative, and sometimes it is, but there is a line between covering something once and permanently taking on work nobody assigned you. The difference is whether anyone else knows it is happening. Work you have quietly absorbed does not show up in a review, does not get resourced, and does not stop when you are on vacation. If you are going to take something on, make sure you speak up about it.

Leadership style is the other one. You can influence how a working relationship functions such as the cadence, the format, what gets escalated and when. You cannot rebuild or dictate how another person operates, and attempting it is the most common way people spend a year of effort on the single variable they do not control. Get honest early about which of those two you are working on.

Why Managing Up Matters for Your Career

Your manager has real influence over your career and their read on your work factors into promotion conversations, project staffing, and who gets tapped for the next visible initiative. Managing up well pays off in ways that show up across years, not just at annual reviews.

A few of the biggest returns:

  • It builds trust, so the harder conversations get easier over time
  • It makes sure your work is understood and credited, rather than quietly absorbed into the team's output
  • It cuts down on friction, rework, and surprises nobody enjoys
  • It speeds up your development, because people advocate harder for those they trust
  • It gives you more say over how you work, since trust tends to loosen the reins

That last one is the real prize and it is worth being precise about it. Managing up is often described as making your manager's job easier, which is true but it also misses the point. The reason to do it is that it gives you more control over your own working life: what you get pulled into, how much room you have to make decisions, and how often you have to defend choices you have made.

Read the Evidence You Already Have

Almost every guide on this topic tells you to ask your manager how they prefer to communicate. It is reasonable advice and most people never do it, partly because the question feels awkward and partly because the answer is often aspirational. Plenty of managers will tell you they want the big picture and then ask for the details.

So start with what you can observe instead.

  • What gets an immediate reply, and what sits for two days: This is the most honest priority list you will ever get. Stated priorities are what someone believes matters and response time is what actually does.
  • What they ask about first: The opening question in a check-in is whatever was on their mind before you walked in. Track it for a month and the pattern will be clear.
  • What they forward versus what they keep: Work they pass along is work they trust other people with. Work they hold onto is work they feel personally accountable for. Knowing which bucket your project is in tells you how much detail they will want.
  • Where they add detail when they review your work: Nobody edits evenly; the sections they rewrite are the sections they consider high-stakes, and those are the ones to bring them early next time.
  • How they brief their own manager: If you have ever watched them present upward, you have seen their preferred format for information under pressure; that is the format to hand them.

Read those five and most of your day-to-day choices answer themselves. Someone who replies in minutes and skims detail needs two lines and a clear ask. Someone who reworks your reasoning needs the reasoning attached and a day to sit with it.

There is one question still worth asking directly, because you genuinely cannot observe it: what your manager is being measured on this quarter, their targets, and the pressure sitting above them. Ask in a 1:1, then ask again next quarter, because the answer changes with progression.

It also helps to read this from the other chair. Our conversation on what hiring managers really want covers similar ground from the manager's side, and a lot of what managers describe looking for comes down to someone who understands the pressure they are working under.

7 Habits That Make Managing Up Work

None of these require a personality change. They are habits, and you can start most of them this week.

1. Flag Risks Before They Become Fires

Nobody likes a surprise, and managers particularly dislike the kind they hear about from their boss first. Raise risks while they are still small enough and before they turn into something urgent.

The instinct to wait until you are certain is understandable, but usually wrong. By the time something is an obvious problem, most of the good options have closed. Waiting also puts your manager in the worst possible position: finding out late about something you already knew.

Keep the stakes low so the habit is easy to maintain: "Heads up on something small. X came up on the Y project. I don’t think it moves our timeline, but I just wanted to make sure you had visibility on it." That sentence costs you nothing and it buys your manager time, which is the currency they are shortest on.

2. Bring a Solution With the Problem

Compare two updates: "We are going to miss the deadline." vs "We are behind because of X, and here is how I think we get back on track." The second shows ownership and foresight and the first hands over a problem with no solution.

You don’t need to have the whole answer, and pretending to have it when you don’t is its own problem. Even a partial plan changes the shape of the conversation, and moves it from diagnosis, which your manager now has to do, to a decision, which is the part they are good at.

3. Report Outcomes, Not Activity

"I finished the project" doesn’t tell your manager much, but "The new process cut turnaround time by about 20 percent" gives them something they can repeat in a room you are not in.

That distinction matters because your manager is not just evaluating your work, they are also representing it. Handing them an outcome instead of a task is the difference between them saying you are reliable and them saying what you had a hand in changing.

This becomes more important in hybrid and remote work, where nobody sees the effort behind the result. When your work is not visible by default, making it legible becomes part of the work. A two-line written summary of what changed and what it produced is worth more than any number of hours someone watched you put in.

4. Lead With Your Recommendation, Not the Question

This is where a lot of otherwise strong people undersell themselves. "What would you like me to do?" feels respectful, and occasionally it is the right question, but used as a default it hands the thinking back, and it trains your manager to expect that they will be the one doing it.

Make the call and show your work instead: "Here is where I landed and why. I would go with X, mainly because of Y. The tradeoff is Z, and I think it is worth it. If you see it differently, please let me know."

If your conviction is genuinely low, say so rather than retreating into a question. "I am leaning toward X, but I’m not entirely sure, do you have five minutes?" is still a point of view. It just tells your manager how much weight to put on it, which is information they need anyway.

5. Be Explicit About What You Need

The most frustrating feedback exchanges come from a mismatch; you wanted a gut check on the direction and you got line edits on slide four. Neither of you did anything wrong; you just never said which one you were asking for.

"I am looking for a gut check on the direction, not wording yet, since that may change anyway." Or "I need a decision on this ideally by Thursday rather than a full review."

Naming the kind of input you want takes one sentence and changes how useful the response is, and it also saves your manager from guessing, which is a favor they will notice.

6. Run Your 1:1 Like You Own It

Too many people treat the 1:1 as a status report they deliver upward, but you can flip it, it’s your meeting after all. Show up with your own agenda:

  • Recent progress, tied to what the team is measured on
  • Your top priorities right now, so any misalignment surfaces early instead of at the deadline
  • Anything you need from your manager specifically
  • One thing you are working on developing

That last item does more than people expect. Most managers are trying to figure out what to invest in on your behalf and working from very little information. Telling them what you are building makes it dramatically easier for them to put you forward when something relevant comes up.

7. Give Upward Feedback Well

If you have ever been asked how your manager could better support you and gone blank, the problem is usually structure rather than honesty. Broad characterizations feel risky to say and are impossible to act on, so most people default to "everything's fine."

Three parts can fix this:

  1. Name the moment
  2. Name the specific thing that happened
  3. Name the effect it had on the work

"In Thursday's review, when the scope changed partly through the discussion, I lost track of what we had actually committed to, and I rebuilt the wrong version of the deck." That is usable; there is a moment, a behavior, and a consequence. "You are hard to follow sometimes" is not.

Keep it to one example rather than a pattern. A single instance is a thing that happened; a pattern is a verdict on someone's character, and it will be heard that way no matter how carefully you word it.

The same skill runs in the other direction. For example, taking a no, or feedback you did not want, without going quiet or getting defensive is part of the same muscle and it is usually what earns you the standing to give feedback in the first place. You can learn more on turning rejection into a strategy and improve on that reflex.

When Your Style and Your Manager's Don't Line Up

Not every working relationship clicks on its own, and when it doesn’t, the useful move is to identify what the gap is rather than adjusting your personality.

Start With a Diagnostic Question

If it feels like you are being micromanaged, there is a question worth asking before anything else: are you being micromanaged, or are you under-communicating?

It is uncomfortable, and it is often the answer. What reads as hovering is frequently a manager filling an information gap you left open, and they are accountable for something they cannot see, so they keep asking.

You can test it easily. For two weeks, send proactive updates before they are requested. If the check-ins ease off, the issue was information flow and you have just solved it. If nothing changes, you have learned something and lost nothing but a few short messages. Run that test first, because the two situations call for nearly opposite responses.

When Your Manager Needs More Visibility Than You Are Giving

Some managers carry accountability for work they cannot see directly, and they need more signal than you would send over naturally. Over-communicate deliberately: a standing written update, sent before it is asked for, covering what moved, what is next, and what needs them. The frequency can come down as trust builds, but it has to be built first, and volunteering information is how you build it fastest.

When Your Manager Is Stretched Too Thin to Give You Structure

A manager running a wide team or carrying a heavy portfolio may not have the bandwidth to set a cadence for you, so set it yourself. Put recurring time on the calendar, arrive with an agenda, and keep a short written record of what was decided so neither of you has to remember it.

Don’t think of it as compensating for a failing here, but instead, you are removing one more thing someone has to hold in their head, which is genuinely valuable and tends to be noticed.

When Context Is Not Reaching You

Sometimes the information exists and simply is not making it to you, so put it in writing. A quick recap after a conversation, "confirming what we landed on so I do not drift" protects both of you and closes the gaps that verbal exchanges leave behind.

Over time that habit pulls more context toward you for a practical reason: it is much easier for someone to correct a written summary than to remember to brief you from scratch. You are lowering the effort required to keep you informed.

When Your Manager Is New to Managing

This one is common and rarely named: a strong individual contributor promoted into management is learning an entirely different job, often without much training and while still carrying some of their old work. Early on, that can look like over-indexing on detail, hesitating on decisions, or going quiet while they absorb a lot at once.

The useful posture is patience plus clarity. Be explicit about what you need instead of waiting for them to figure it out, offer feedback using the three-part structure above rather than saving it up, and keep in mind that the two of you are building this relationship at the same time. Some of the strongest manager relationships people describe started right here: the shared experience of figuring it out tends to stick.

None of these situations put managing up out of reach, they just change which move comes first.

Managing Up When You Are Both Rooted

Most advice on this topic quietly assumes a short relationship: get what you need, build the résumé line, move on in two years. That assumption does not hold everywhere, and it changes the math more than you think.

In an organization where people build long careers, you and your manager may be working together for years. A few things follow from that:

  • Short-term wins that cost trust are a bad trade: Going around someone to get a fast yes might work once. In a long relationship it is a withdrawal you may still be paying back in two years.
  • Your manager may have held your job before you: That is an asset; they know exactly where the work gets hard and which corners are safe to cut. Very few people think to ask them what they would do differently in your seat.
  • Institutional memory beats being right: In a long-tenured workplace, the reason something is done a particular way is often a decision someone made years ago for a reason that still holds. Ask about the history before proposing the fix, and your proposals will land better.
  • Your manager is usually the one who recommends you: Where internal movement is a real path, the person who vouches for you is typically the person who has managed you. That makes this relationship less like a transaction and more like a compounding investment.

The habits do not change, but the time horizon does, and it generally argues for the patient version of every choice.

What Managing Up Can't Fix

Managing up is not a tool for changing who someone is. If you have adapted how you communicate, asked what matters to them, built a real cadence, and the relationship still is not what you would like it to be, you have done the part that was yours to do. Continuing to push on what you do not control mostly costs you energy you could be spending somewhere else where it compounds.

It also does not mean saying yes to everything. Setting a boundary is part of managing up, not an exception to it, as long as you bring the tradeoff with you rather than just the refusal. "I can take that on,  but to do it properly I would need to push X to next week. Would you rather have that, or something rougher on the original date?" That gives your manager a decision to make instead of a problem to solve.

And some situations are not managing-up situations at all. If something moves into policy or conduct territory, that is a conversation for HR or employee relations, and no amount of 1:1 preparation is the right tool for it. Recognizing which category you are in saves a great deal of effort.

Where the relationship is working but you want more from your path, there are usually more options inside an organization than people assume: a skip-level conversation, a mentor outside your reporting line, a stretch assignment with another team, or a move into a different department. Managing up well is what makes most of those conversations possible in the first place.

How Next Level Careers Helps You Build Valuable Career Skills

Managing up is one piece of a much larger picture. If you are working on this alongside everything else like getting your work seen, building the case for your next step, or figuring out what you want your path to look like, the Next Level Careers library is built for exactly that, with conversations from leaders who have sat on both sides of this relationship.

Like what you’re reading?

Never miss our latest insights when you subscribe to our newsletter.